Writing for CNN is, like, harrrrrrrd!

I’m told CNN is considered a news source in the United States. From a CNN review of the Hyundai Veloster automobile comes this loose and sloppy collection of errors. Speed is a big question? No, speed is the rate of distance travelled over time. One of my biggest questions is “What happened to article before phrase ‘fourth door’?”. I, also, would like to know, what made the writer think, four spurious commas are necessary, in the second two-sentence “paragraph”—not to mention at least eight spurious words (and the writer also needs coaching on the proper deployment and configuration of parentheticals). “Back seats” is not oneword. The writer got into…er, sorry, where, exactly? What has an occupant’s lower intestinal condition to do with the lesson E must learn? For that matter, the writer seems creepily certain an occupant of the Veloster will never again be tired, thirsty, hungry, or horny; E’s sole need will be to learn a lesson once.

Not the Brightest Bulb in the Annunciator

Again from FlightBlogger—a new goldmine for TTAG—is a comment chock full of errors. I pray to Murphy that this guy has never worked on nor will work on any plane I will fly in the future. In six lines I count fifteen errors. That’s a terrible ratio, Buzzy.